Coincidence is only an honest word after a year of daily work

Both camps are arguing about the verdict, and I think the trouble lies earlier. Whoever says coincidence or sign is reading a hit they never set up to be read. The ceremonial orders understood this rather well. You banished daily, you wrote the intent in the diary before the working, and you recorded the outcome afterward, whether anything stirred or not. Only against that steady background does an odd event stand out from ordinary noise. Without it, coincidence is a mood and sign is another mood. Most chaos methods lean on the same habit and rarely say where they found it. In my experience, the people most certain of either word keep the thinnest records. Have you actually kept a diary for a full year, and what did an ordinary week in it look like?